Clik here to view.
WHIPPING BOYS AND WITCH HUNTERS
In an earlier post I alleged that frequentist hypotheses tests often serve as whipping boys, by which I meant “scapegoats”, for the well-known misuses, abuses, and flagrant misinterpretations of tests...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Part 3: Prionvac: How the Reformers Should Have done Their Job
Here’s how the Prionvac appraisal should have ended: Prionvac: Our experiments yield a statistically significant increase in survival among scrapie-infected mice who are given our new vaccine compared...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Saturday Night Brainstorming & Task Forces: The TFSI on NHST
Each year leaders of the movement to reform statistical methodology in psychology and related social sciences get together for a brainstorming session. They review the latest from the Task Force on...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Do CIs Avoid Fallacies of Tests? Reforming the Reformers
The one method that enjoys the approbation of the New Reformers is that of confidence intervals (See May 12, 2012, and links). The general recommended interpretation is essentially this: For a...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Anything Tests Can do, CIs do Better; CIs Do Anything Better than Tests?*...
*The title is to be sung to the tune of “Anything You Can Do I Can Do Better” from one of my favorite plays, Annie Get Your Gun (‘you’ being replaced by ‘test’). This post may be seen to continue the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Repost (5/17/12): Do CIs Avoid Fallacies of Tests? Reforming the Reformers
The one method that enjoys the approbation of the New Reformers is that of confidence intervals (See May 12, 2012, and links). The general recommended interpretation is essentially this: For a...
View ArticleClik here to view.
G. Cumming Response: The New Statistics
Prof. Geoff Cumming [i] has taken up my invite to respond to “Do CIs Avoid Fallacies of Tests? Reforming the Reformers” (May 17th), reposted today as well. (I extend the same invite to anyone I comment...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Saturday Night Brainstorming and Task Forces: (2013) TFSI on NHST
Saturday Night Brainstorming: The TFSI on NHST–reblogging with a 2013 update Each year leaders of the movement to reform statistical methodology in psychology, social science and other areas of applied...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Do CIs Avoid Fallacies of Tests? Reforming the Reformers (Reblog 5/17/12):
The one method that enjoys the approbation of the New Reformers is that of confidence intervals. The general recommended interpretation is essentially this: For a reasonably high choice of confidence...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Anything Tests Can do, CIs do Better; CIs Do Anything Better than Tests?*...
Having reblogged the 5/17/12 post on “reforming the reformers” yesterday, I thought I should reblog its follow-up: 6/2/12. Consider again our one-sided Normal test T+, with null H0: μ < μ0 vs μ...
View ArticleClik here to view.
WHIPPING BOYS AND WITCH HUNTERS
This, from 2 years ago, “fits” at least as well today…HAPPY HALLOWEEN! Memory Lane In an earlier post I alleged that frequentist hypotheses tests often serve as whipping boys, by which I meant...
View ArticleClik here to view.
2015 Saturday Night Brainstorming and Task Forces: (4th draft)
TFSI workgroup Saturday Night Brainstorming: The TFSI on NHST–part reblog from here and here, with a substantial 2015 update! Each year leaders of the movement to “reform” statistical methodology in...
View ArticleClik here to view.
WHIPPING BOYS AND WITCH HUNTERS (ii)
. At least as apt today as 3 years ago…HAPPY HALLOWEEN! Memory Lane with new comments in blue. In an earlier post I alleged that frequentist hypotheses tests often serve as whipping boys, by which I...
View Article
